On this page

Context: In 2015, Public Health England popularised the line that e-cigarettes were “95% safer” than smoking. While focused on toxicants and cancer risk, that message underplayed a crucial factor: the addictive nature of nicotine and how vaping makes access to it smoother, cheaper and more constant.

Act 1 — Origins: Cigarette Lookalikes With a Halo

The first e-cigarettes mimicked traditional cigarettes—slim white sticks with glowing tips—pitched as quitting tools. The 2015 “95% safer” framing gave them a public health halo. But “safer” in terms of fewer smoke toxins is not the same as “less addictive”. By treating vaping as mainly a chemistry question, not an addiction and behaviour question, regulators left a wide open door.

Act 2 — Transformation: From Quit Aid to Lifestyle Gadget

E-cigs quickly evolved. Flavours exploded: bubblegum, mango ice, cotton candy, strawberry milkshake. Devices became sleeker and brighter. Crucially, nicotine salts arrived—making high-strength nicotine feel smooth, removing the harsh throat hit that once limited intake.

Affordability supercharged usage. Disposables often cost less than a coffee yet can deliver nicotine rivaling multiple packs of cigarettes. Lower costs mean more frequent use; quiet, odour-light devices mean use in places where smoking never happened. The habit shifts from timed “cigarette breaks” to an always-on drip feed.

Act 3 — The Human Cost: Stories of Addiction and Regret

Behind the statistics are people who believed the promise, only to feel more trapped:

“I quit smoking and switched to vaping, thinking it was healthier. But I vape constantly — in the car, at my desk, even at home where I never used to smoke. It feels impossible to stop now.”
“With cigarettes, I could count them: ten a day, twenty a day. With my vape, I’ve no idea how much nicotine I’m getting — I’m just inhaling all the time.”
“I tried to quit vaping and the withdrawal was brutal. I’d managed to quit cigarettes before, but vaping has its hooks in me deeper.”

Journalists and campaigners report the same pattern: months or years spent trying to stop; spiralling spend on disposables; and a sense that vaping quietly moved from harm reduction to dependence intensification.

Act 4 — The Missed Scandal: How Public Health Got Outplayed

Cigarettes came with natural limits: a cigarette ends, a pack runs out, smoke and smell draw social boundaries. Vapes remove those limits. There’s no built-in stopping point, fewer environmental cues, and devices/fluids are cheap and ubiquitous. The result isn’t less nicotine, but more — delivered faster and more often, with fewer barriers.

The scandal hidden in plain sight: while the absence of smoke toxins dominated the conversation, the industry re-engineered nicotine into a ruthlessly efficient delivery system—smoother, cheaper, flavoured, and effectively limitless.

Act 5 — Why It Matters Now: The Next Generation Hooked

  • Flavours mask nicotine’s harshness and attract non-smokers, particularly the young.
  • Affordability keeps usage high; pocket-money pricing normalises constant consumption.
  • Nicotine salts enable high-dose vaping with minimal irritation.
  • Unlimited access turns nicotine into background behaviour rather than a timed ritual.

We are not witnessing the end of nicotine addiction but its modernisation—slicker, sweeter, and easier to sustain.

Conclusion: The Real Cost of “95% Safer”

Nicotine is not “safer” simply because it’s vapour. Addiction is not harmless because it tastes like mango. Cigarettes are being replaced not by freedom from nicotine but by a system designed to keep people hooked.

Flavours, affordability, and endless access make vaping the perfect storm: a product marketed as harm reduction while deepening dependence. The 2015 soundbite was a public health miss of historic proportions. The real question isn’t whether vaping is safer than smoking—it’s how many more people will be trapped before we admit the truth.

Notes & References

On record: In 2015, Public Health England promoted the “95% safer” message about e-cigarettes in comparison to smoking, primarily referencing toxicant exposure reductions. This page argues that message downplayed the addictive nature of nicotine and how vaping’s design, flavours and affordability intensify dependence.

Further reading: affordability studies; reporting on difficulties quitting vaping; youth uptake and flavour appeal; nicotine salts and delivery speed. (You can link to your dedicated evidence hub here: /evidence.)